The two native Azure solutions comprise Azure Files and the new Azure NetApp Files offering from NetApp. There are several different storage options available for the profile containers in Windows Virtual Desktop and Citrix Cloud environments on the Microsoft Azure platform service. Remote Desktop Services (RDS) Client Access License (CAL) and Subscriber Access License (SAL)įSLogix solutions may be used in any public or private data center, as long as a user is properly licensed.Windows 10 Enterprise E3/E5 and Windows 10 Education A3/A5.A functional difference between the two is that a Profile Container persists all Windows settings and applications, regardless of where they are stored in the user profile by mounting a virtual disk to the user’s session at session startup and redirecting the user profile to this virtual disk.Įligibility for using the FLogix profile container is included in most Office365 offerings including: The FSLogix Profile Container is a more advanced solution, compared to the classic Microsoft roaming profile. FSLogixįSLogix is a profile container solution, designed to roam user profiles and settings between different devices and/or sessions. When moving to Azure cloud, it is therefore recommended to use Azure storage services, but which one should you choose? This research will compare various Azure storage configurations to store the FSLogix profiles.ĭisclaimer: This research intends to validate the performance difference between the various storage solutions and is not aimed as a scalability research into the saturation point of the tested solutions. One of the design recommendations is to ensure the profiles are stored as close as possible.
This move resulted in a great adoption of FSLogix as it is for almost everybody available. Since the acquisition of FSLogix, Microsoft has decided to include FSLogix in the majority of the Office365 offerings.
0 kommentar(er)
